Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Sugar company axes child labour

15 January 2013
By Stuart White and May Titthara
130115 02a

Sok Mey, a 13-year-old child labourer, cuts sugarcane on land owned by the
Phnom Penh Sugar Company in Kampong Speu province earlier this month. The
company is owned by CPP Senator Ly Yong Phat. Photograph: Vireak Mai/Phnom
Penh Post
Rulling party Senator Ly Yong Phat’s Phnom Penh Sugar Company announced
yesterday that it had amended its hiring policy to forbid contractors from
employing children, while at the same time, opposition parliamentarian Mu
Sochua made public her plans to visit the company to investigate its labour
practices.

According to a copy of a January 9 internal memo provided by the company –
and issued five days after an article was published in the Post detailing
the widespread use of child labour at the company’s Kampong Speu sugarcane
plantation – the company warned contractors responsible for hiring
plantation labourers that anyone caught hiring persons under the age of 18
would be fined 50,000 riel ($12.50) on their first offence, and have their
contract terminated on their second.

Calling the January 4 news report “helpful” in bringing the issue to his
attention, Phnom Penh Sugar Company director Andy Seng said in an email that
the company had been unaware that contractors were using child labourers,
and noted that contractors’ responsibilities extended beyond just “the
finding of large numbers of workers”.

“[Contractors] must be observing all business, legal and moral standards
required,” Seng said.

“We were not aware that some of the contractors... had brought in under-age
workers to the field. The Cambodian society is family-prone, and it is hard
to take a quick look to differentiate children who merely accompany their
parents to workplace or otherwise,” he added.

Sochua, citing the same article, posted a statement on her website that she
and other opposition MPs would request a visit to the factory to look into
the issue, and to disseminate information on the labour law to locals.

In an interview yesterday, she said that she was planning a trip to Europe
to address the issue of so-called “blood sugar” with EU parliamentarians,
and stressed that the “company cannot just be let off the hook because of
this internal memo”, calling the very use of contractors a major problem.

“I don’t support these companies who use contractors, because these are not
professional contractors,” she added, highlighting the room for
falsification of documents and exploitation. “They are local people. Some of
them are landless who are being used by the factories to gather labour.”

Seng, Phnom Penh Sugar’s director, said that the reason for using
contractors is simple: “It is neither operationally efficient nor
cost-effective for us to do it ourselves.”

“We found it too time-consuming to manage workers on our own, so we
outsource,” he said.

“The Phnom Penh Sugar Company is not physically capable of micromanaging
details as such,” he continued. “All we can do is supervise, so human rights
and business targets are met in the most balanced term.”

Sochua, however, maintained that contractors operate in an “environment
where you’re going to recruit among the most vulnerable”, and that simply
preventing them from hiring children didn’t go far enough.

“The children are not working, that’s positive. But are they going to
school? Are they being fed? Do their parents have a living wage?” she asked.
“This is like throwing people into the middle of the ocean and saying ‘you
swim or you drown’. The people are drowning.”

According to villager Sroun Phally, 46, things certainly aren’t easy.

Though Phally’s husband and three of her children still work in the cane
fields, her two youngest, aged 9 and 12, have not been allowed to work since
the memo went into effect.

When interviewed nearly two weeks ago, Phally said she pitied her children,
wishing they could leave work and return to school.

But now that they’ve left work, she said, little has changed. Her children
still can’t attend school regularly, because the teacher rarely convenes
classes.

“They told my sons [that they couldn’t work] about a week ago, and the
reason is that they were afraid my sons would get a health problem,” Phally
said, noting that it was health problems that made her give up her own job
in the fields about a year ago.

Though workers’ wages depend on the amount of cane they cut, Seng said the
company pays outside labourers 27,000 riel per tonne of sugarcane cut.

Without her children’s income, she says, she’s had to return to work, this
time as a vendor at the company-owned market.

“Now I am not selling well,” she said. “I don’t know how I can earn the
80,000 riel or so to pay for my rented space every month.”

No comments:

Post a Comment